AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

AUTHORITY TOLD LORRY'S SWAY UPSETS SHEEP

7th February 1958
Page 56
Page 56, 7th February 1958 — AUTHORITY TOLD LORRY'S SWAY UPSETS SHEEP
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

BECAUSE the swaying of his present four-wheeled vehicle upset sheep being carried to market, a Kirkcudbright haulier was last week allowed to substitute a six-wheeler without producing witnesses. British Railways objected, but they were told by Mr. W. Quin, Scottish Licensing Authority, that the grant to Mr. W. McMurdo, Sanquhar, could not do them any harm.

Mr. J. Kirkland, for the applicant, said his present platform vehicle was used in conjunction with a three-tier livestock container weighing 2 tons, . The sixwheeler, using the same container, would give increased capacity of 2 tons.

Answering Mr. J. Gibson, for British Railways, Mr. McMurdo said most of his livestock operations were to markets within a 40-mile radius, and amounted to a third of the work of his seven-vehicle fleet. The new vehicle would be engaged on livestock haulage for nine months of the year. Mr. Gibson replied that there were no customer witnesses, and no evidence to justify a grant—except for the inconvenience of sheep.

Granting the application, Mr. Quin said it was a small one by a haulier with four Aand three B-licence vehicles in a rural area. Swaying was not a good reason for spending a lot of money on a new vehicle. but the objectors had given no evidence of alternative facilities.


comments powered by Disqus