1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 
k giant step
Page 4
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
?. introduction of tachographs took another decisive step forward last week en the Minister of Transport issued draft regulations on the tirriing of the gent of the instrument. Another decisive step will be taken when the ulations become law next month.
Thereafter it is for the industry to keep to the time-table to ensure that the trument can be put to work in 1982. Despite doubts over the ability of the hograph manufacturers to cope with original equipment orders, the gramme is workable.
Mr Malcolm Banks, FTA's president and director-general Mr Hugh itherstone have offered no more than token resistance to the timetable. /thing less would have seemed capitulation, anything more would ntually have proved embarrassing. The trade associations have accepted law 3o also will the trade unions in time. They have two years to make an erly withdrawal from their entrenched position. We can expect them to ee to the fitting but not to their use. In two years the position will have nged to acceptance — possibly at a price.
3y introducing the instrument, Fowler has done no more than )Iement a section of Barbara 3tle's Transport Act 1968 and :ept the Luxembourg Court ruling ;sed to him by his predecessor, William Rodgers.