AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

METROPOLITAN MOVER

18th February 1988
Page 47
Page 47, 18th February 1988 — METROPOLITAN MOVER
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Austin Rover has had rather a lean time in the car-derived-van market of late. Five years ago it held 30% of the CDV sector, with sales of over 25,000 vans. By the end of last year its stake was down to 17%, with sales of under 18,000.

That decline can be traced to a mixture of corporate neglect, and insufficient product. Faced with all its political and financial problems, Rover Group has not exactly given CDVs a high priority. It certainly took its time bringing out van versions of the Metro and Maestro, and was woefully slow to introduce a diesel engine for the latter, despite a strong interest in compression-ignition engines among CDV buyers.

By the time the Maestro diesel did put in an appearance, in October 1986, many former Austin-Rover operators had already switched to diesel-powered models from other manufacturers.

The story, unfortunately, does not end there, because there still isn't a diesel Metro to compete with the diesel Fiesta, Peugeot 205, Renault R5 and VW Golf — and this deficiency will not be rectified until at least 1990, when the Metro replacement (codenamed R6) is launched.

Last year Metro van sales plummeted by 35% to 3,736 units, while Ford sold 5,036 Fiesta hatchback vans, helped by its 1.6-litre diesel model.

Austin Rover's fortunes could be changing, however: last month its registrations increased by 20%, although we shall have to wait and see if this is a flash in the pan or a real renaissance.

Prospective Metro van buyers may not have the option of a diesel, but there are, at least, four petrol engines to choose from. These are the highand lowcompression four-cylinder A-Plus power units, rated at 31kW (41hp) and 34kW (46hp) respectively in 998cm3 form, or rated at 43kW (57hp) and 46kW (62hp) respectively as a 1,275cm3 unit. It was the last of these that was fitted in our 1.3-litre Metro 310L van.

The transverse-mounted A-Plus engine is no spring chicken, at least when compared with the latest lean-burn units from Ford, or Bedford's perky Family II CDV petrol engines. Its roots go way back to the old three-bearing 803cc engine fitt...-d in the original Austin A30.

All the old A-Series components have long since been changed, however, and AR has screwed every last gram of power it can out of the naturally-aspirated APlus, engine without compromising reliability.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus