AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

No Customer Witnesses— No Grant

13th May 1960, Page 58
13th May 1960
Page 58
Page 58, 13th May 1960 — No Customer Witnesses— No Grant
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AS a result of Mr. Hanlon's refusal to grant applications for additional vehicles to meet increasing demands for road transport from the big steel companies, solely on the evidence of supporting letters, hauliers are likely

to urge their customers to discontinue their present practice of declining to send witnesses to court.

At Newcastle last month, after refusing an application by Siddle C. Cook, Ltd., to add 12 articulated outfits to an A licence, on the ground of a successful tender to carry more than 2,000 tons for the South Durham Steel and Iron Co., Ltd., to South Wales, Mr. Hanlon said the limited value of letters was well known. If the South Durham company wishes to allocate work to a particular haulier, they must prove need for additional facilities..

He was asked for a decision in writing . so that a copy could he sent to the South Durham company. A large tonnage of steel is carried by -British Railways and the road operators believe that pressure is exerted to prevent the attendance of witnesses in these cases.