AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Tankfreight drivers offered lump sum

9th September 1993
Page 18
Page 18, 9th September 1993 — Tankfreight drivers offered lump sum
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Tankfreight is offering around 300 non-petroleum drivers a £225 lump sum for the rest of the year, instead of a percentage pay rise.

The company also wants the drivers to accept a pay freeze between 1 January and 5 July this year.

The Transport & General Workers Union expects the chemical and edible goods drivers will reject the deal in a ballot which will be counted this week. TGWU regional trade group officer Jim Gouldbourne says the drivers would be much better off with a percentage pay increase: "After tax has been taken out of the £225 there will not be a lot left for the drivers," says Gouldbourne.

"They would be much better off with a percentage increase which would cover overtime, holiday and sickness pay ments. And it would give us a higher figure to start bargaining from in next year's pay talks," he adds.

Another 75 drivers carrying other non-petroleum goods for Tankfreight will not be covered by the deal. Gouldbourne says he has put in a "substantial pay claim" for them.

Tankfreight says the lump sums would be introduced alongside a re-structured reward mechanism. Working parties of management and union shop stewards should come to an agreement on these proposals in November.


comments powered by Disqus