AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

'Reluctant' SMMT on Mudflap Design

9th July 1965, Page 33
9th July 1965
Page 33
Page 33, 9th July 1965 — 'Reluctant' SMMT on Mudflap Design
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE Society of Motor Manufacturers

and Traders were "not falling over themselves with enthusiasm" about improving mudfiaps on commercial vehicles, said Lord Lindgren, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Transport, in the Upper House.

But, he added, he thought that the Society would co-operate in improving the design of vehicles and guards for vehicles.

A Road Research Laboratory report had been submitted to the Society in January, and the Ministry had had an interim reply from them.

Lord Lucas of Chilworth suggested that the cure for the "acute problem" of spray was not in the design of the motor vehicle. The point was the slowness with which surface water was drained off highways and the increasing speed of vehicles. How that could be overcome was one of the headaches the Ministry was going to have in the future.

Lord Lindgren agreed. Road drainage. he said, was one of the problems, as also was the tread of the tyres and the speed of vehicles. He added that side spray was perhaps a greater' interference to the following vehicle than spray thrown up.

Lord Somers wondered whether the Minister would consider laying down regulations about their design.


comments powered by Disqus