AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

_ess downtime claim for front-end loader

9th January 1982, Page 13
9th January 1982
Page 13
Page 13, 9th January 1982 — _ess downtime claim for front-end loader
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

kCK ALLEN (Motor Bodies) Ltd Birmingham has introduced a pnt-end loader it has had on ial over the past 18 months.

The company claims that aintenance costs and Dwntime are better than anticiAed and is to market the body 25.2 and 27.5cum (33 and icuyd) sizes.

In conjunction with Leyland, Ick Allen has converted the Dnstructor 6 from 24 tons to 28 ins gvw. The addition of a selfeering front axle is said to low adequate tolerance in eight distribution to keep the den vehicle within legal limits.

The body shown here is a !.9cum (30cuyd) model but the iar tailgate bustle adds a rther 2.3 or 4.5curn (3 or iuyd).

The arm and fork assembly is a 3.628 tonnes (8,0001b) ipacity lift with a main cylinder rust of 40.8 tonnes (90,0001b). automatic top door and side iield prevent refuse blowing it of the bin on discharge. An 03m (80m) wide and 22m 7in) long hopper opening nmits maximum-size coniners to be used.

Tags

Locations: Birmingham