AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

BRF criticizes route document

9th August 1974, Page 24
9th August 1974
Page 24
Page 24, 9th August 1974 — BRF criticizes route document
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE TRANSPORT Minister's lorry route document (CM last week) has been criticized by Mr Robert Phillipson, director of the British Road Federation, as being inadequate. It did not, he said, include some of the most important roads in-Europe.

Mr Phillipson said that while the Federation approved of the principle of designated routes, this could only be achieved if there was an adequate road network to take the traffic.

As an example it was clearly nonsense to sever the route from the Mid

lands to the East Coast ports compelling lorries to go as far north as Nottingham in order to reach Felixstowe, The Federation is intending to give its comments to the Minister and will ask him to reconsider the omission from the document of the following routes: MI/Al link; M I extension from Pudsey to Dishforth; the Aire Valley Motorway; M40 Oxford to Birmingham Motorway; the Manchester to Sheffield Motorway; and the Manchester Outer Ring Road.

Tags

Organisations: British Road Federation