AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

LEGAL RISKS SURROUNDING TWITTER

8th November 2012
Page 19
Page 19, 8th November 2012 — LEGAL RISKS SURROUNDING TWITTER
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Defamatory tweets – if a tweet lowers a person’s standing in the estimation of right-thinking members of society it will breach the law of libel.

Harassing tweets – tweets that a reasonable person would conclude could cause alarm or distress might amount to harassment.

Threatening tweets – generally, an intention to cause harm or intimidation might break either criminal or civil laws. Impersonating tweets – misleading or giving an untrue representation as to a person’s identity on Twitter could amount to fraud. Tweets revealing personal or confidential information – tweets revealing personal details about another person without their consent might breach data protection laws. Copied tweets – a tweet that reproduces the work of another without consent will offend copyright law, if that work gives evidence of another’s creative choices in arranging words, images or sounds. Malicious tweets – false tweets with the intention of injuring another’s commercial interests, or recklessness as to the truth, will amount to malicious falsehood.

Menacing tweets – if a tweet could create fear or apprehension in the minds of anyone who might reasonably be expected to see it, then it could be considered a menace. Deceptive tweets – is the tweet deceptive in nature or likely to deceive?


comments powered by Disqus