1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
..et's keep Cars )ut of this
8th March 1980, Page 113
8th March 1980
Page 113
Page 113, 8th March 1980
— ..et's keep Cars )ut of this
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
/AVID ABELL, chairman and lanaging director of Leyland 'ehicles Ltd, has been at pains ) point out that the company as nothing to do with those -ightful people who make cars at nobody seems to want. The se of the name Leyland in conection with BL Cars is, he says, frustrating and misleading," nd unnecessarily upsets mpioyees, distributors and ustomers.
Unlike BL Cars, Leyland ehicles was able Vast year to hed about 5,000 workers without any significant internal isputes–. Another 200 rnployees left in the first six
weeks of this year, and the planned reduction of staff has almost been completed.
Fewer men are producing more vehicles and the respectable end of the Leyland empire has started the Eighties on a hopeful note.