1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
DoE's failure to be explicit
Page 43
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Glasgow agent James Law criticized the DoE's failure to be explicit on the requirements of documentation on preventive maintenance inspection when he appeared before the Scottish deputy LA in Glasgow for Kenneth Building Services Ltd, of Dreghorn. Mr Law added: "I have voiced this complaint many times • but I am a voice crying in the wilderness. The sooner the Department decides on a specific type of form the better for all concerned."
The firm operated five vehicles and had six authorized. The company asked continuation for five vehicles and admitted three delayed and two immediate prohibitions.
Mr H. R. Aylmer, deputy LA, accepted that the firm had taken steps to improve its efficiency but he curtailed the licence by the removal of one vehicle for one month and granted continuation of five vehicles.