AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Strike boosts postal hopes

8th July 1993, Page 13
8th July 1993
Page 13
Page 13, 8th July 1993 — Strike boosts postal hopes
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

by Karen Miles • Hopes of short-term postal work for private carriers were boosted this week as Royal Mail union leaders said there was little hope of averting strike action across the Capital.

The warning came as the Government admitted it has powers to suspend the Royal Mail's monopoly, which allows it to be the only operator that can collect and deliver a letter for less than £1. The Department of Trade and Industry says: "So far it's a hypothetical situation but in the event of a strike we will look at the situation and respond accordingly"

As CM went to press, Royal Mail management and Union of Communication Workers officials were in crisis talks—the UCW

backed by a 55% strike mandate.

The union was unwilling to specify whether action would take the form of one-day strikes, stoppages rotating between different sorting centres or an "all out'', indefinite dispute.

Any strike—whether the Government chooses to scrap the £1 monopoly or not--could offer rich pickings for private carriers. The Royal Mail's 21,000 staff in London, including 5,000 drivers, handle 3.5 million letters and packages a day.

Some carriers, including Britcloc and TNT, view the prospect of a strike with interest TNT chief executive Alan Jones said the threat of a strike was "yet another good reason why we should be granted a licence to run postal services".

The dispute is over Royal Mail compensation plans for workers involved in the closure of five sorting centres in London because of overcapacity The UCW says some staff could lose up to £70 a week through the changes although Royal Mail says it will be offering "fair compensation payments".


comments powered by Disqus