1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144 
Undertaking invalid under new legislation
Page 50
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• After an agricultural contractor had narrowed the conditions of the B licence he sought for two vehicles and had given an undertaking with regard to further facilities, 12 hauliers withdrew their objections to the application in Leeds last week.
J. D. Ireland, Sherburn, Vale of Pickering, was seeking to carry three agricultural commodities at different seasons. For the applicant, Mr. P. Kenny said these vehicles had been on short-term licence since April 1967 but that some of the traffic had been carried by him within a farming partnership with his father, under C licence for three years prior to this.
Mr. Ireland also sought to carry sugar beet to, and sugar beet pulp from, the British Sugar Corporation, York.
Mr. Ireland also sought to carry fertilizers on behalf of Hargreaves Fertilisers Industries Ltd., within 200 miles of Bridlington. For the multi-drop type of delivery involved, it was essential that the haulage contractor was familiar with farming practices, said Mr. Kenny.
An undertaking was given by the applicant that he would not seek, within the next 12 months, to carry agricultural produce and requisites for local farmers or corn for Byass Ltd., but the objectors, represented by Mr. J. Taylor, said they would not seek to restrict Mr. Ireland with regard to rights he might acquire under any new legislation introduced. The licence was granted as amended.