1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148 
DON'T STOP
Page 44
Page 45
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
CIIn February I purchased a secondhand 3k tonne tractor unit from a dealer. It had low mileage on it and before I made th decision I spoke with the previous owner who said i was an excellent wagon. Six weeks after buying it 1 started to get trouble, eventually culminating in an engine rebuild. I spoke again to the previous own er who then told me that when he had the vehicle 1 had had the engine rebuil four times by three different dealers. He eventual] threatened action against the dealer, who replaced vehicle, he had been by the dealer to keep mouth shut. Now the icle has been repossesbecause I stopped ing the lease company. Manchester
It sounds like collusion and if you can prove it should report the matter our local trading standards :e which should take action er the Sale of Goods Act. au should be able to prove ages for loss of earnings insist on a replacement de. Where you have gone ng is in stopping the lease Tients. The lease is a diffe: transaction and repossesis their only recourse unyou had previously end their help. Many owner ers do stop paying when r have problems but that is worst course of action.