AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Bamford's Plea Was "Impertinent 9 9

6th November 1959
Page 49
Page 49, 6th November 1959 — Bamford's Plea Was "Impertinent 9 9
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

WHEN Eric Earls Bamford, who is serving a seven-year prison sentence for fraud, sought discharge from bankruptcy at Derby county court last week, Judge Braund described the application as amounting almost to impertinence.

Until a receiving order was made against him in December, 1955, Bamford ran a haulage fleet from Alfreton, Derbys. His business transactions had resulted in a number of hire-purchase companies losing some £140,000.

"I am living in the shadow of degradation," said Bamford. "I am penniless, for I made no gain from these transactions and I shall find great difficulty in rehabilitating myself in the outside world."

Opposing the application were Mr. W. W. Jordan, Official Receiver, and Mr. Brian Bush, representing the hire-purchase companies. Mr. Jordan recalled that when the receiving order had been made against Bamford, his liabilities were stated to be not less than £142,300.

Refusing the application, the judge said that Bamford would not be released from prison before 1961 "even under favourable circumstances."


comments powered by Disqus