AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Doubtful centre

6th December 1986
Page 30
Page 30, 6th December 1986 — Doubtful centre
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Decision has been reserved on the battle between West Lancashire District Council and Ken Abram over the use of the company's operating centre in Rufford near Orrnskirk.

Following a licensing tangle involving a number of public enquiries and two appeal hearings, the Transport Tribunal directed North Western Licensing Authority Roy Hutchings to reconsider the company's bid for authority to operate from the former premises of Cauncey's Transport with a licence for 22 vehicles and 36 trailers. The company had been forced to move from its previous premises at Parbold, where it was licensed for 12 vehicles and 24 trailers, because of planning enforcement action taken by the district council.

The council and local residents argued that the Rufford premises were totally unsuitable for the number of vehicles applied for. They asked that the application be refused because of the company's failure to comply with environmental conditions imposed when the LA initially granted authority.

John Backhouse, for the company, denied that there had been any breach of the conditions. He said that the trailers were now owned personally by Abram who was not subjected to restrictions of operators' licensing, not being the operator and there was nothing to prevent him keeping the trailers at Rufford. The company only hired trailers from Abram when they were in use, consequently it did not require an operating centre for them. There was nothing to prevent a licence being granted for a greater number of vehicles than the operating centre was capable of accommodating, provided the LA was satisfied that the additional number would be on the road at any one time.


comments powered by Disqus