AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Defects led to inquiry

6th August 1976, Page 19
6th August 1976
Page 19
Page 19, 6th August 1976 — Defects led to inquiry
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

NON-APPEARANCE by a one-vehicle coal merchant at a public inquiry led , to an appearance at a Transport Tribunal hearing for E. and L. Wilks Fuels Ltd last week.

When its 0-licence came up for renewal it applied in the normal manner for a new one, but the LA's office wrote to Mr Wilks telling him that as he had received a prohibition order and a defect notice there would be an inquiry.

He failed to attend the inquiry and the deputy LA, Mr P. G. Mercer, heard ' unchallenged evidence from the vehicle examiner. Mr Mercer adjourned the hearing for Mr Wilks to attend.

At the tribunal hearing Mr Wilks said that he would like to attend the hearing to give his side of the story and the tribunal decided that the case should be sent back to the deputy LA for relisting and a new hearing.