AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Test failures fall says VI report

5th September 1991
Page 87
Page 87, 5th September 1991 — Test failures fall says VI report
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• The number of I-EGVs and PSVs failing the annual test have both fallen by almost :3% according to the Vehicle Inspectorate's [des( annual report. The failure rate for semi-trailers fell by 1.6% during the same period.

Four out of five of the most common reasons for trucks failing their test are brake related. First is the service brake performance (7.0%), second is the secondary brake (5.7%), third the park brake (4.9%) and fifth is brake components (4.1%). On trailers the story is much the same except that plate details come in second place, accounting for 7.1% of failures,

On PSVs, brake related failures are much lower. Braking components account for 5.8% of failures — service brakes are in sixth place (4.0%). Body interior and headlamp aim are the two most common reasons for failure scoring 7.8 and 7.1% respectively.

During the report period there was a rise of almost 20% in I IGV maintenance investigations and operator appraisals at 38.192. For PSVs the corresponding figure rose by 1% to 3,598. The number of HGVs stopped in roadside checks also rose by 28% to 112,661, while delayed prohibition rates fell by 1% to 8.2%, with immediate prohibitions down 0.25% to 7.1%.

During the same period the report shows a 5.35% increase in PSVs stopped at the roadside, with immediate and delayed prohibition rates falling by 1% and 0.4% to 5.6% and 4.9% respectively.

Of the 32,012 HGVs observed only 2.81% were found to be emitting excessive smoke (down from 2.83% last year). The VI, however, has expressed concern over a 1% increase in lighi goods vehicles being prohibited at spot checks and says that the rate is nearly 50% higher than the equivalent rate for HGVs.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus