1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168 
HA refuses to make public Orwell Crossing legal advice
Page 14
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
By Chris Tindall THE HIGHWAYS Agency (HA) is refusing to release the legal advice it received that would explain why it attempted to ban members of the public from buying food and drink at the Orwell Crossing Lorry Park.
The future of the essential Suffolk truck park was hanging by a thread last summer when the government agency claimed that permission to build the site in 2002 was made only on the basis it would serve truck drivers, not the general public.
Site owner Karl Rout was forced to spend £50,000 to appeal against the decision and fight for the ban to be lifted.
He said the truck park would have to close if the appeal failed, because the business would become financially unviable. This would have sparked havoc in the county, with hauliers having almost nowhere secure to park up.
But planning inspector Michael Ellison allowed the appeal (Orwell truckstop allowed to serve the public', CM 2 August 2007), although restrictions on advertising are still in place.
A request by CM under the Freedom of Information Act for the legal advice the HA received relating to its restrictions has been refused on the grounds that "there is a very substantial public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of legal professional privilege material".
HA regional director Gwyn Drake admits that although there is a clear public interest in the work of the government being scrutinised, the relationship between a lawyer and client must be protected.
He adds: "Legal advice will include arguments in support of final conclusions, but also relevant counter-arguments. This could set out the perceived weaknesses of a department's position." Rout says he is not surprised at the HNs response: "We heard their legal defence at the inquiry; it was very full of holes, it was almost petty."