1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160 
Ford Ranger Ford is still mounting a challenge with its
Page 20
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Ranger. though it remains very much in the old-school category. With the introduction of the next-generation of pickups, the Ranger is looking increasingly dated in its ability. That's not to say that it's completely out of the game as strong mechanica Is and a unique—except lathe closely-related Mazda U2500 —rear-door arrangement, which does away with a 0-pillar, give il a selling point. But the antiquated non-common-rail engine, producing 107hp, feels stressed and torque delivery is limited in its range. To its credit the payload of 1.135kg is strong and build-quality is good.
As a driving machine it lacks overall refinement, feeling clunky in its operation. The driveline is on the loose side and there is the traditional pickup bounce that makes driving in the wet a chore. Off-road it steps up a gear and digs in when required. but progress is only average.