AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Tacho charts recorded only part of journey

5th January 1995, Page 15
5th January 1995
Page 15
Page 15, 5th January 1995 — Tacho charts recorded only part of journey
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Some missing mileage on its tachograph charts cost Pine Products £395 in fines and costs. The company, of Siddow Common, Leigh, pleaded guilty to four offences of being the user of vehicles when the drivers failed to use their tachographs, and to two offences of failing to produce tachograph records.

Prosecuting before the Leigh, Lanes magistrates, Michael Bakker said it was a case of missing mileages. The drivers were only putting charts into their tachographs after they had covered some miles. The finishing destination on Michael James chart for 10 February was shown as Leigh, but on the chart for 11 February his place of starting was shown as Rugby.

On 2 March his finishing destination was shown as Derby, but on the chart for the following day his starting place was shown as Leigh. On Alan Shepphard's tachograph charts there were discrepancies totalling more than 200 miles.

Defending, Bob Toppin said he had a degree of sympathy with

haulage companies trying to earn a living and having to comply with such complicated regulations which he described as an absolute and utter nightmare.

In this case the managing director of Pine Products had issued instructions to the drivers about compliance with the regulations; a copy of the regulations was available to them. The company was not aware that drivers were failing to comply with the regulations until the charts were analysed by a police officer. The system had since been improved.

The magistrates fined the company 50 per offence with 195 costs.