AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Dubious gains from 38 tonnes

5th February 1983
Page 4
Page 4, 5th February 1983 — Dubious gains from 38 tonnes
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

The Commercial Motor/Leyland Vehicles 38-tonne workshop held last Friday underlined our opinion that the new upper weight limit will be of little service to the industry. We found more confusion than enthusiasm for 38 tonnes.

Projected savings through increased carrying capacity are likely to disappear in greater capital and operating costs.

Manufacturers are still unable to quote with confidence the cost of conversion of existing equipment. The cost of original equipment is equally uncertain.

Running costs will rise but no one is able to say firmly by how much per mile, per tonne or per hour. There will be operational advantages for some operators but early evidence suggests — as we predicted — they will be very much in the minority.

The great consolation for those attending the workshop, was that 40-44 tonnes cannot be long delayed. That would produce savings and advantages.

In the meantime the confusion mounts and we intend to do something about it. Attendance at the workshop had to be limited as will attendance at any conference.

From today CM is opening a 38-tonne inquiry desk. Send us your inquiry. We will find the answer if there is one. Names will not be divulged. Our answering service is available for use out of hours.

The confusion must be cleared soon. May 1 is the day when the legislation takes effect.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus