1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
Operator failed to co-operate with Vosa
Page 23
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
AN OPERATOR that played hard to get when approached by Vosa and the Traffic Area Office has lost its 0-licence. The company director had claimed to be "frightened" by such approaches and had chosen to ignore them.
North Western Deputy Traffic Commissioner Mark Hinchliffe revoked the two-vehicle licence held by D&S Services (Atherton), holding that both the company and its transport manager, Peter Churnside, had lost their repute.
Neither the company nor Churnside appeared before the DTC.
Vehicle examiner Stephen Brock said that he had experi
enced great difficulty in contacting the company to carry out a maintenance investigation. When he did manage to do so, director Sean Eckersley said that he had received the telephone messages and letters, but had just panicked and filed them away, being frightened. The maintenance issues were quite minor, but the problem was getting hold of Eckersley.
Brock said he had not met Churnside and Eckersley had been on the defensive the whole time.
The DTC said the company also failed to respond to letters from the Traffic Area Office (TAO).
On the day of the hearing, TAO staff tried to contact the company without success. They had spoken to Eckersley's brother-in-law at the operating centre, the premises of T Hill Transport, and had been told that Eckersley was aware of the public inquiry. A company search had revealed that Companies House was proposing to strike the company off.
The partnership between the industry, Ts and Vosa depended upon co-operation. There had been a wilful failure and the company had shown an unwillingness to participate in the 0-licensing regime.