AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Operator and six drivers face 103 hours offences

4th October 1974, Page 16
4th October 1974
Page 16
Page 16, 4th October 1974 — Operator and six drivers face 103 hours offences
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

SIX DRIVERS and their Braddon and Sons (Hauliers) Ltd, of Dartford, faced 103 charges Df infringeing the hours regulations laid down in Part 6 of the Transport Act 1968, when they appeared at Dartford magistrates' court his week.

At the first day's hearing, 1,ichard James Johnson, a !river of the firm, was found ;uilty of failing to keep a :urrent record of work, and ailing to take an interval of est for his meal. Mr Johnon, of 22 Cedar Close, ;wanley, was fined £45. tonald William Field, of 56 )over Road, Northfleet, /as found guilty of seven harges of exceeding the periitted working day, and was fined £40. Derek Charles Hudson, of 67 Denton Road, Welling, was found guilty of 15 charges of making false entry on his log sheets, and was fined £74 plus £10 costs. John Edward Ward, of 18 Riverside Court, St Mary's Cray, was found guilty of three charges of failing to keep a current record of work, and was fined £28.

Charges were still to he heard against John Herbert, Joseph Patrick Cuddy, and the firm, Braddon and Sons. on Wednesday.

The case arises from a Department of the Environment silent check on the depot of Braddon and Sons at Dartford.