AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Unused Vehicles Struck Off

4th March 1955, Page 39
4th March 1955
Page 39
Page 39, 4th March 1955 — Unused Vehicles Struck Off
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

"REF hauliers who applied to the 4orthern Licensing Authorityon day to renew their B licences had vehicle strengths reduced because -JeS had not been used.

le Alfred Maw, Sunderland, had used his two vehicles' since June, , and June, 1954, respectively. His told the Authority that the vehicle h came off the road in 1951 had been replaced because of her and's illness, and the other vehicle ired a new engine.

ie applicant had been in business 1933. Customers had written is offering work. A new licence granted for one vehicle.

r. F. L. Thompson, Shildon, was led about the condition of his des. Four out of five had been off road since January, 1954, because . total prohibition by an official

pplicant said that during the past he had been building a new garage pped with modern plant so that in re he would have better mainnee facilities. During 1954 the one lining vehicle had been worked ind the clock " by three drivers rating two Or three shifts a day, the de had earned about £2,300. A of £609 had been paid to subrectors.

elo new vehicles were on order. licant was prepared to amend his ication to cover three vehicles.

Etc Authority granted a licence for vehicle in use and two to be iired. " If these two vehicles are taken up within three months," he , "then I shall have to look at the again."

.essrs. Scott Bros., Whitley Bay, ied for a licence renewal in respect hree vehicles. One had not been

d since December, 1953, and her since June, 1954, and the ice was granted for two vehicles.