AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Carberry licence charges adjourned

4th July 1991, Page 16
4th July 1991
Page 16
Page 16, 4th July 1991 — Carberry licence charges adjourned
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Leigh Magistrates have adjourned hearing a series of charges against the partners in Liverpool-based Carberry Haulage concerning the alleged use of stolen vehicle excise licences.

Hugh Joseph Carberry is accused of one offence of stealing five vehicle excise licences; one offence of dishonestly handling five stolen excise licences; five offences of making a false instrument (an excise licence); five offences of fraudulently using excise licences; five offences of using vehicles without excise licences; and two offences of using vehicles when a higher rate of vEr) was payable.

James Carberry and William Stanton are each accused of five offences of using vehicles without excise licences; and two of using vehicles when a higher rate of VED was payable.

Prosecuting, Mark Smith alleged that Carberry Haulage had been using five vehicle excise licences which were the proceeds of a burglary in Dorset. Hugh Carberry had admitted buying them from a person unknown in a pub, and that he had filled in the details on the licences before they were put on the firm's vehicles. There was a claim for the payment of back duty totalling Z6,328.26.

For Hugh Carberry, Kevin Dooley said that evidence would be produced to show that he was not a partner in Carberry Haulage and had been only a driver.

The magistrates adjourned the hearing until July when they will decide whether the allegations against Hugh Carberry should be dealt with at Bolton Crown Court.


comments powered by Disqus