1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 
LNADIAN DID NOT 1DERSTAND
Page 31
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
LONDON haulage company was fined a total of £20 plus 5 gns, costs 3.treenwich Court last week for nine aces of failing to keep current records .espect of a licensed goods vehicle. firm, R. K. Crisp (Haulage) Ltd., of 'ord, SE, pleaded guilty.
he driver of the vehicle. Stanley grcaves, of Woolwich, also pleaded ty to committing the offences. He lined a total of O.
Ir. Richard Hawkins. for the Ministry fransport. said that when Hargreaves driving one of the firm's lorries he stopped in a routine check and asked troduce his work records. He could do so. When questioned he said: got up late and was in a hurry, I :ot to make them out."
ater he told his questioners: " I do understand them." On May 14 Mr. p produced the records for the vehicle, they were incomplete and inaccurate. Lionel Thompson, representing p Haulage and Hargreaves, said that firm had been in business for 35 and that Mr. Crisp assumed that greaves had been filling in his records, ztrgreaves was a Canadian, said Sir lel, and did not fully understand the lish system of keeping records. He been working for the haulage corny for only six months. Since the manses had been served the firm had igurated ii completely new system of .ing sure that work sheets were signed.