AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Part Grant in Unopposed Application A LTHOUGH opposition was waist – %

3rd September 1965
Page 30
Page 30, 3rd September 1965 — Part Grant in Unopposed Application A LTHOUGH opposition was waist – %
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

drawn from an application by Chambers and Cook Ltd., at Birmingham on Wednesday, to add eight vehicles to their A licence by transferring five from Contract A and three from B. it was granted only in part. Giving his decision, Mr. R. Hall. the West Midland deputy LA said that on the evidence he had heard he felt justified in granting only six vehicles in all—the five contract vehicles and one from the B licence. The normal user applied for was goods for Charles H. Pugh Ltd., Parkinson Cowen Group Transport Ltd., and Cube Products Ltd., as required. The applicant company was also granted an additional vehicle on B licence for collection and delivery within 25 miles' radius of base.

Tags

Locations: Birmingham

comments powered by Disqus