1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 
Part Grant in Unopposed Application A LTHOUGH opposition was waist – %
3rd September 1965, Page 30
3rd September 1965
Page 30
Page 30, 3rd September 1965
— Part Grant in Unopposed Application A LTHOUGH opposition was waist
–
%
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
drawn from an application by Chambers and Cook Ltd., at Birmingham on Wednesday, to add eight vehicles to their A licence by transferring five from Contract A and three from B. it was granted only in part. Giving his decision, Mr. R. Hall. the West Midland deputy LA said that on the evidence he had heard he felt justified in granting only six vehicles in all—the five contract vehicles and one from the B licence. The normal user applied for was goods for Charles H. Pugh Ltd., Parkinson Cowen Group Transport Ltd., and Cube Products Ltd., as required. The applicant company was also granted an additional vehicle on B licence for collection and delivery within 25 miles' radius of base.