1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236 
"FRIVOLOUS" APPLICATION
Page 69
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
REPUDIATED • • IT was hoped that Licensing Authori-.
ties would draw the attention of the Minister of Transport to cases of this sort with a view to obtaining powers to impose costs, Mr. G. H. P. Beames told Mr. J. R. Lindsay, North Western Deputy • Licensing Authority, at Liver• pool on Tuesday.
Mr. E. A. Whitehead, on instructions from the Road • Haulage Association, had applied to withdraw an application by Mr. W. :T. Smith, Liverpool, to add to the conditions of four B-licence vehicles, "Goods for United Carriers, Ltd., within 200 miles of Liverpool abbatoirs."
After Mr. Lindsay had read a letter from United Carriers which said that they had never been consulted by the applicants and would not have supported their case if they had, Mr. Beames, for the British Transport Commission, pointed out that a great deal of time had been involved in the preparation of the case.
Mr. Lindsay described it as a frivolous application and, in view of the letter from United Carriers. the Authority would write to Mr. Smith