AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Second Car Transporter Refused

3rd June 1960, Page 51
3rd June 1960
Page 51
Page 51, 3rd June 1960 — Second Car Transporter Refused
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AN application by an Aberdeen haulier for a second licence to transport new cars and tractors north from English factories was refused, last week, by Mr. A. Robertson, Scottish Deputy Licensing Authority. He was told that a grant would seriously jeopardize the LondonAberdeen steamship service. The application, by Mr. John K. Gordon, was supported by three motor agents from Aberdeen, Banff and Elgin.

Mr. Gordon said that railway facilities were unsuitable and that regular cargo steamers between London and Aberdeen operated only once a week. The motor agents said that, because of the sailing schedule, seven days sometimes elapsed before cars could be shipped to Aberdeen. They were anxious to improve deliveries to their customers. Road transport gave a door-to-door service which saved time and labour. Mr. Frederick T. Farrant, manager and secretary of Aberdeen Steam Navigation Co.. Ltd., said that 25-30 cars were taken north every week. They had been carrying cars ever since cars were made, and had never been asked to carry more cars than they could handle. The company also provided storage facilities at their premises. A direct sailing of 36-hours' duration was offered and, if required, more than 30 cars could be carried each week. They were not exposed , to the weather, continued Mr. Farrant. 'A car transporter, he said. could take 10 cars per week. A second, if allowed, could seriously jeopardize their well-established LondonAberdeen service.

Mr. George B. Strachan, for British Railways, said that they gave a cheaper, faster, and more reliable service than road transport.


comments powered by Disqus