AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Operators in paraffin case launch a court challenge

3rd August 2006, Page 16
3rd August 2006
Page 16
Page 16, 3rd August 2006 — Operators in paraffin case launch a court challenge
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

A long-running 0-licensing wrangle is likely to run on a little longer

following a Leeds public inquiry. Mike Jewell reports.

ONE OF the industry's bitterest licensing sagas is likely to continue at least until September, the North Eastern Deputy Traffic Commissioner has heard.

The story of Sylvia Pallas, trading as Pallas Transport, and John McCaffrey, trading as Montana Freight Services of Birtley. County urham, dates back to a Customs raid in February 2()03 when paraffin was allegedly found in a fuel store and in vehicle fuel tanks.

The 0-licences held by the two operators were revoked by NorthEastern TC Tom Macartney following a public inquiry in October 2003 on the grounds of repute and financial standing.

Those decisions were upheld by the Transport Tribunal on appeal; the Tribunal ordered that the revocations should take effect from the end of July 2004. However, that decision was appealed to the Scottish Court of Session, which directed that the matter be reconsidered by a different TC.

An application for a fresh 0licence by McCaffrey, trading as MontanaTransport, was refused in January 2005 by Deputy Traffic Commissioner Mark Hinchliffe.

Now, at the hearing ordered by the Scottish Court of Session, North-Eastern Deputy TC Elizabeth Perrett has heard that there will be a further delay pending a court challenge over the issues surrounding the paraffin.

Appearing for the two operators, Gary Hodgson said the issues were a challenge to the analysis of the samples taken by Customs in 2003, and McCaffery and Pallas's knowledge of the alleged paraffin. Civil proceedings over these issues are due to be heard at Edinburgh Sheriffs Court at a two-day hearing in September.

Customs officer Steve Hopkins said his understanding was that the Scottish proceedings involved litigation by Pallas seeking the value of the fuel seized by Customs.

He reported she was maintaining that she had lodged an appeal with Customs within the required 30-day time limit, which was being disputed. That was the issue that would be determined by the court in Scotland.

If it was decided that the appeal had been lodged within the time limit, Customs would then have to bring proceedings in the magistrate's court to show that the seizure had been a valid one.Though anxious to assist, Customs needed to protect its position until the litigation was concluded.

Adjourning the case pending a preliminary hearing on 22 September with a full hearing in the week commencing 16 October,the DTC requested that Vosa carry out an up-to-date maintenance assessment for both operators.

Hodgson said that could be beneficial for or detrimental to the two operators. The DTC commented that her concern was to ensure the fleets were roadworthy and did not kill anybody.


comments powered by Disqus