AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Fined at Re - hearing H E N Sheffield magistrates last VY

31st January 1964, Page 27
31st January 1964
Page 27
Page 27, 31st January 1964 — Fined at Re - hearing H E N Sheffield magistrates last VY
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

January dismissed a charge against a railway lorry driver for causing his vehicle to wait in a no waiting area" the police appealed against the decision, The Divisional Court ruled that, because the driver was inquiring about loads and not actually loading or unloading, an offence had been committed under the traffic regulations, and costs of 125 gns. were awarded against the driver (The Coinwe.trial Motor, Novem her 1, 1963). Last week the magistrates. following the Divisional Court's ruling that the case had been proved, considered sentence and fined the driver, Mr. H. Walker, £3.