1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178 
Vignette could level the playing field in the UK
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
(WAS INTRIGUED, though not entirely surprised, to read the article regarding the lack of resources available toVosa to curtail the operation of European cowboy operators (CM 2 November).
It has been evident for some time now that we do not have a level playing field; the consequences for British operators failing to abide by the rules are far greater than those for our Continental cousins when and if they are caught.
However, the question of taxation has been an issue that continues to vex me.As a result (would like to share my solution to the problem.
LGV taxation in this country should be abolished and replaced by a vignette tax, the cost being based on the current level of vehicle taxation for vehicles covered by the 0-licensing system in this country. For other vehicles entering the UK the vignette would be set at,say, £20 per day, payable in advance based on the estimated length of stay.
lithe vehicle did not leave the country within the stipulated length of time, additional taxes would be paid when the vehicle left the country.The administration of this scheme could be based on the present system used on the Continent,with vignette passes sold by the ferry companies. Eurotunnel and garages.
The existing enforcement authorities could carry out the policing of the system, with vehicles being checked on embarkation to ensure that the correct fees had been paid for the time spent in the UK.
The cost implications of my suggestion would be neutral for the British haulier, but would clearly impact on the foreign operator who currently makes little or no contribution to the exchequer.
It could persuade foreign hauliers to base part of their operations within the UK, thereby subjecting them to the rigours and rules of the 0-licensing system. It could also dissuade the foreign haulier from illegal cabotage.sinee the cost implications of retaining the vehicle within the UK might be prohibitive.
The implementation of my suggestion might also allow additional funding to be made available to Vosa. thereby enabling the agency to finance more vehicle checks, both of UK and Continental-owned LGVs.
pass on my thoughts as an international haulier who has seen a dramatic rise in the number of foreign vehicles on our roads and a decline in revenues from cross-border business over the past few years. I believe that the British haulier is as efficient and accomplished as any of its Continental rivals, and given the right circumstances can equal or better the opposition.
I hope that the road transport sector might then begin to redress its decline and emerge as an important contributor to the success of this country.
Graham Levet Chairman Birds Groupage Services Oldbury, West Midlands