AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Tribunal decides on Dee relaunch

30th April 1992, Page 7
30th April 1992
Page 7
Page 7, 30th April 1992 — Tribunal decides on Dee relaunch
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• North East LA Frederick Whalley acted perversely and breached natural justice when granting John Dee Limited an 0-licence, the Road Haulage Association told the Thnsport Tribunal in London on lliesday.

The RHA was objecting to the licence on the grounds that the company was not a fit person, of good repute or of appropriate financial standing due to its directors' involvement with the failed John Dee Group.

For the RHA, Stephen Kirkbright argued that after the LA had concluded the inquiry in December he had invited directors John Davison and Peter Newton to his chambers. That meeting, in the absence of the RHA, was contrary to natural justice, said Kirkbright.

The John Dee Group crashed last year owing millions of pounds to small hauliers. The case continues.


comments powered by Disqus