1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236 
Normal User Justified by Haring
Page 55
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A NOVEL proposition came before the ri North Western Deputy Licensing Authority, Mr. A. H. Jolliffe, at Liverpool last week, when Harper and Mylrea, Ltd., sought to justify a normal user for one vehicle covering Lancashire, Cheshire, North Wales, Yorkshire, Midlands, London and southern counties and Scotland.
Mr. D. H. Mace, for the applicants, said that in 1958 the shares of a Liverpool haulage company, William Harper, Ltd., were acquired by another haulage concern and thereafter the services of two directors, Mr. Harper and Mr. Mylrea. together with 16 members of the staff, had been dispensed with.
Many of the company's customers had requested them to continue to arrange their haulage and after an opposed application in November. they were granted two vehicles on B licence. Most of the work, however, had had to be done by sub-contracting.
Figures showed that this was substantial, and that Harper and Mylrea were big customers of British Road Services. Aspecial-A vehicle had been acquired in March this year, for which a public A licence was now sought, and a second vehicle had been assigned to the company recently.
The vehicle which was the subject of the application had been working with hired lorries, which were going regularly to the places mentioned in the normal user. Although it could not be said that it went normally to all of them, it was used as an integral part of their service to customers when difficulties arose with sub-contractors.
There were no objections as sought, was granted. and a licence, A.E.C. CAN NOW EXTEND
A N appeal by the Associated Equip
ment Co, Ltd., against a refusal by Southall Borough Council, acting for Middlesex County Council, to permit the erection of certain new buildings, has been allowed by the Minister of Housing. The company sought to erect a new inspection and dispatch building, a new office block and a stores extension.