AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Common law protection

2nd January 2003, Page 15
2nd January 2003
Page 15
Page 15, 2nd January 2003 — Common law protection
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• There are lots of old laws which also protects against unfair competition. These are called economic torts (wrongs). The main ones are:

• inducing or procuring a breach of contract. Eg, company A has agreed to distribute the goods of company B for three years in a particular territory. Company C approaches company A and says: "Break your contract with B and sell our goods Instead." C is inducing A to break its contract with company B, so companies A and C may both be liable to pay damages to company B. It is necessary that the contract between A and B Is lawful and is not an unreasonable restraint of trade. Or say employee E has a confidentiality clause in his contract with company A which keeps Its pricing policy secret. E goes to work for company B, where he is asked to reveal his former employer's confidential pricing policy.

• Merciless competition is not unfair competition; to be unfair there has to be Interference by an unlawful means. Letting the air out of the competition's tyres at a truck stop would be an example of this.

• if your competitors plot unfair competition, even if they never get around to doing anything about it, there might still be a conspiracy and that might get you an injunction.

• Lies and slander which damage your business are grounds for legal action. If your competitors are falsely claiming that you are neglecting vehicle safety checks and maintenance you will have a good claim. You may not even have to prove any actual loss.

Tags