AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

One-eyed drivers

2nd January 1970, Page 30
2nd January 1970
Page 30
Page 30, 2nd January 1970 — One-eyed drivers
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

I agree with the letter from Mr. S. Mustell (CM December 12, "No reason for exclusion-) who argues that men with one eye. history of epilepsy or a badly deformed or missing limb should not be automatically excluded from holding an h.g.v i cence. His remarks are common sense.

I know a good driver of an artic who has loss of sight in one eye, and another, an owner, tester and engineer, who drives all types of vehicles—and holds a clean licence.

However, I consider that the standard of today's driving is far below average, and I am all for road safety. But I would suggest that the MoT gets proof before rushing into legislation to restrict drivers from obtaining h.g.v. licences.

In a CM editorial it was stated that "no sane person will quarrel with automatic exclusion from h.g.v. driving of men with one eye.

To be perfectly blunt, as a sane man I will quarrel with any authority which issues statements which may harm a person's livelihood. I wonder whether any member of the BMA has been so unfortunate as to lose the sight of an eye and is a driver.

I will go even further and issue a challenge to the BMA. MoT or any other body over this matter. At my own expense I am willing to prove that I am talking sense by producing one of the drivers about whom I am writing, plus five or six vehicles, in order to conduct a test and prove that a one-eyed man can be a good driver.

Those who should be banned from driving are the maniacs involved recently in the motorway madness.

J. HOLLEY, Epsom, Surrey.

Tags

Organisations: BMA
People: S. Mustell
Locations: Surrey

comments powered by Disqus