AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Nothing silly about enforcement

2nd August 2007, Page 28
2nd August 2007
Page 28
Page 28, 2nd August 2007 — Nothing silly about enforcement
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

I WONDERED IF I might take issue with a couple of points made by Ralph Ingham-Johnson (CM 19 July). in particular his assertion that enforcement officers engage in "a silly season-.

With over 9,000 convictions of commercial drivers a year (for offences ranging from speeding to tachograph offences, as well as Working Time Directive and drivers' hours offences). no enforcement agency needs to engage in a silly season — the drivers line themselves up in the shooting gallery anyway.

The second point he made was about the need to keep tachographs for longer being used by DfTNosa as a -rich harvest of infringements".

As I recall, the need for a driver to keep more tachographs was simply to bring the use of analogue tachos in line with digital ones.

The solution to Mr Ingham-Johnson's problem must therefore lie with the operators buying more vehicles fitted with digital tachographs or even retrofitting them.

However, as regularly reported by CM, the numbers of new vehicles sold last year fitted with an analogue tacho reached an all-time high as operators flocked to avoid the new technology. Moreover, if you look at the number of employers that admit to not offering their employees additional training (43%. CM 19 July), it is a fair assumption that an awful lot of employers don't pay much attention to the need to train their drivers in tachograph use.

While enforcement might be down to Vosa, if employers supply sufficient training, the likelihood of a driver committing an offence must be diminished.

Robert Roweth

County HCV route manager Cambridgeshire County Council

Tags


comments powered by Disqus