1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
BIG FIRM EXPLAINS WHY IT HAD UNTAXED VEHICLE ON ITS LICENCE
Page 44
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A MANCHESTER transport company was admonished this week by the North Western deputy Licensing Authority, Mr. G. Newman, for allowing a vehicle—untaxed for 18 months—to remain on its carriers' licence. Mr. Newman wanted to know why Translloyd Air Services Ltd. had not put its house in order with regard to licensing.
The company was applying for a continuation of a three-vehicle B licence.
Mr. J. Blades, manager for the applicant at Manchester airport, explained that one of the vehicles had not been taxed since the middle of 1966: it had gone into Translloyd's Salford garage at that time but, because of a directorship change, he had been unable to obtain authorization for its repair or replacement.
He was hoping to obtain this permission soon and in the meantime had had to hire a vehicle. On September 9 the company had applied to remove the disused vehicle from the licence and to hire another to be used with the company's own driver.
Mr. Newman granted the application.