AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

ibunal 'holds

29th July 1966, Page 35
29th July 1966
Page 35
Page 35, 29th July 1966 — ibunal 'holds
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Iputy LA

Transport Tribunal has upheld a :ision by the Eastern deputy Licensing rity refusing to grant a variation to the held by K. and B. Ward Ltd., of d, Beds. An appeal by the company ;missed on Tuesday.

appellant had applied for a variation licence to enable the company to carry for agricultural merchants Jordan ddington Ltd., of Harrold. The main nwas Jordan and Addington's ial haulier, Rowlatt Bros., also of d, supported by W. S. Merrill, of arunston, Beds, and British Railways. of the objectors attended the appeal s E. Havers, for K. and B. Ward, d to earlier evidence and said that it Bros. had been Jordan and AddingIrincipal hauliers for many years, but hey viere satisfactory in the work they y were not always available.

m Rowlatt Bros. were unable to meet and Addington's needs they subzted the work when possible to W. S. . Miss Havers said there was no don that Rowlatt Bros. would suffer if ilication was granted.

Tribunal president, Mr. G. D. Squibb, at K. and B. Ward had made the first with regard to doirlg business with and Addington at a time when the 's fleet of five vehicles was underred.

len an application is based upon employment of the applicant fleet and sterner did not make the first move, els bound to scrutinize the application ire", said Mr. Squibb.

ppeared to the Tribunal that the needs dan and Addington for further transere minimal and the application would have been made if the appellant's fleet )t been under-employed. There was no idence to support the application.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus