AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

CI I write concerning the new h.g.v.

29th August 1969, Page 61
29th August 1969
Page 61
Page 61, 29th August 1969 — CI I write concerning the new h.g.v.
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

licences, particularly as they apply to timber haulage. Many timber hauliers use AEC Matadors and pole trailers—CM August 1, page 41, Table B. gives the various classes. An AEC Matador is a fourwheeled vehicle and one would assume comes under Class 3.

However, our drivers, many of whom have been driving such vehicles for 15 years, also occasionally drive flat lorries such as a Bedford R.L. If they have a Class 3 licence it appears that they would not be allowed to drive such a vehicle and what seems ridiculous is that a driver who passes in Class 2 will be allowed to drive a Matador and trailer having a g.t.w. of around 28-29 tons. In fact a new driver to these particular outfits needs several months' tuition. Could you clarify this matter?

AYou are quite right in your assumptions

about the classes of licence for the h.g.v. scheme. Drivers who get a licence on the most ordinary of goods vehicles having more than four wheels will qualify in Class 2 and be able to drive Matadors which themselves come into Class 3.

The Ministry considered whether drawbar trailers should be included in determining the classifications but it was eventually decided that there were so few drawbar trailers in use that the complication was not really justifiable. The operating industry, too, had asked that drawbar trailers should be ignored because of the possible complications. One of the results is the anomaly set out in your letter.