1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190 
600 fine for assuming an exemption TWO BROTHERS were ordered
Page 37
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
to pay fines and costs totalling £630 when they failed to appear before the Ystradgynlais Magistrates to answer charges of using a vehicle without a tachograph. Beth Thomas, prosecuting, told the court that a vehicle driven by Sean Asprey, of Whitwood.
Castle ford. was stopped by police while carrying a load of traffic cones and other equipment through the Swansea Valley. He was reported for not using a tachograph.
The vehicle belonged to Gary Asprey of Altofts, Wakefield. When West Yorkshire police were sent to interview him he insisted that the lorry was exempt from the tachograph regulations The two men had since written to the court, maintaining that the vehicle was exempt. However. Thomas said the defendants had to prove they were exempt from the regs.
The magistrates found the case. Sean Asprey was fined E220 and Gary Asprey £330. each with £40 costs.