AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Call for Telecom 0-licencE

28th November 1981
Page 4
Page 4, 28th November 1981 — Call for Telecom 0-licencE
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

BRITISH TELECOM's claim that it did not need a goods vehic operator's licence for its 356 purpose-built vehicles used for ere+ ing telegraph poles failed in the High Court in London last week. Telecom had argued that the vehicles, which were fitted with crane-like arm and power-driven auger, were not goods vehicl within the meaning of the 1968 Transport Act. But Lord Justice Ormrod and Mr Justice Woolf, sitting in ti Queen's Bench Divisional Court, said the vehicles were goo vehicles as they were capable of carrying telegraph poles.

They allowed an appeal by the Licensing Authority against ChE ter magistrates last June acquitting Telecom — then the Post Offi — of using a pole-laying vehicle at Holyhead, Gwynedd, withoul licence, while it was carrying six poles.

The judges ordered the case to be sent back to the magistrat with a direction to convict.


comments powered by Disqus