AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

FRASER ROSS APPEAL REFUSED A Nappeal by Fraser Ross, of Tain,

28th February 1964
Page 36
Page 36, 28th February 1964 — FRASER ROSS APPEAL REFUSED A Nappeal by Fraser Ross, of Tain,
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

who operate two vehicles on A licence between Glasgow and the north of Scotland and who had an application for a third vehicle on A licence turned down by the Scottish Licensing Authority, was dismissed at the Transport Tribunal hearing on Tuesday.

Mr. R. Mackenzie, for the appellant, agreed that the traffic figures might not be conclusive but argued that the letters submitted did show a very real need of additional facilities to meet long delays between the points handled by the carrier-type service. Mr. G. D. Squibb, president, said that the letter evidence referred to good service in the past, but with recent deterioration, and the decision must depend on evaluation of the weight of evidence.

In the Tribunal's opinion that evidence was not 'too strong and the Authority had had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses and came to the conclusion that there was no case to answer. The Tribunal was not prepared to say that this was a wrong decision by the Licensing Authority.


comments powered by Disqus