AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Local Authortty Oppose Appltcatton • A LOCAL authority opposed an application

27th May 1960, Page 41
27th May 1960
Page 41
Page 41, 27th May 1960 — Local Authortty Oppose Appltcatton • A LOCAL authority opposed an application
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords :

before Mr. J. A. T. Hanlon, Northern Licensing Authority, at Carlisle last week, because they held that the cul-de-sac at the end of which the applicants had premises was not a suitable road over which to run " ungainly " vehicles.

Their objection was strongly resisted, but counted for nothing in the event because Mr. Hanlon rejected the applicadon solely on the ground of lack of evidence of need, Overland Car Deliveries, Ltd., wished to add a car transporter to their B licence to carry cars within 100 miles of Carlisle. Cumberland County Council lodged an objection because the company's premises at Tarraby were not approved.

Mr. T. H. Campbell Wardlaw, who described this objection as "simply monstrous," said that his clients, the applicants, used the Tarraby premises only occasionally. He asked Mr. Hanlon to make it known to the council that they should not object, for this was a "gross abuse" of their powers.

Mrs. M. J. McDowell, a partner in the applicant concern, said that both their existing transporters were fully employed, and new demands could not be met. A customer witness, however, admitted to Mr. F. J. McHugh, for British Railways, who also objected, that the railways' facilities had not been used to any great extent.

Mr. Hanlon said that the application was "a little premature." Although he had not found it necessary to consider the council's objection, he did not think that it was wrong for them to have made it.