1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162 
Registration glitches
Page 13
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• The Freight Transport Association Is still alarmed at the sQof congestion charge-related problems after an FTA memb received a penalty notice despite registering its fleet.
Sue Moody, regional director for London, says that the oper tor had received a letter confirming that It was fully register( However, Just a week into congestion charging it has received penalty notice: ''We don't know yet whether the operator was o of those affected by the direct debit failure (CM 20-26 Feb)—b It did not receive notice that its fleet account had not been act vated (some people were only warned after charging had begun I or whether the fleet account did not work.
One logistics giant claims that not only has it been hit by t failure of Transport for London fTfli to mandate its direct debit, Is still unable to register its fleet fully because a software gilt means that the system does not recognise a two-axled rigid-be curtainsider body type. A company spokeswoman says: "Tfl. sa that it does not know when this problem will be rectified. Until ft fixed, we will have to pay manually for these eight vehicles as th have been rejected from the fleet scheme."
TfL declined to comment.