AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Ken Lane loses licence

26th May 1988, Page 22
26th May 1988
Page 22
Page 22, 26th May 1988 — Ken Lane loses licence
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Nottinghamshire livestock haulier Ken Lane Transport has lost its 0-licence. Eastern Licensing Authority Brigadier Compton Boyd has scrapped its 17-vehicle/25-trailer licence because he believes the firm has lost its good repute.

Boyd had reserved his decision after disciplinary proceedings in March (CM 7-13 April) at which he was assisted by a financial assessor appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport

In his written decision to end the licence, the LA described how the company had appeared at a public inquiry in March 1986 when the LA, Kenneth Peter, had revoked its licence, and issued a fresh licence for 12 months only. Since then there had been 17 convictions for overloading, one for an insecure load, one for a tachograph offence, one for a trailer in a dangerous condition, one for an over-length vehicle, one for using a vehicle while under a prohibition, nine for the nonpayment of vehicle excise duty, and two concerning the transit of animals.

Those nine further offences clearly reflected on the company's fitness to hold a licence, said Boyd. Indeed, the first offence was committed less than a month after the last public inquiry. All three directors admitted equal responsibility and gave no other excuse other than a lack of financial resources. Indeed, it was a considered act of policy to flout the law at Ken Lane Transport, the LA said