AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Sat-nay is no excuse for driving an LGV into a cul-de-sac or a bridge

26th April 2007, Page 26
26th April 2007
Page 26
Page 26, 26th April 2007 — Sat-nay is no excuse for driving an LGV into a cul-de-sac or a bridge
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

IT WAS WITH SOME amusement that I read the article on sat-nays this week (CM 19 April). I think I might have the solution to their problems.

I have my own navigation aid. It cost me £9.99, not the several hundred pounds for a sat-nay device. Its durability has been proved by being dropped, having coffee spilt over it and handled by oily, grubby fingers. Furthermore, it has, so far at least, not needed any outside power source.

It has a handy and comprehensive list that directs you to the correct page. Once there the coloured roads give an indication as to the standard of road and the large area covered allows simple route planning. Even better, it has bridges marked with their heights. Even if the height isn't marked on the page, it at least shows where railways cross roads and a bridge is therefore likely.

It does, of course, have its limitations.After all, for a mere £9.99 it would be unfair to expect perfection. It has for over 30 years failed to get me wedged under bridges or in villages, or even been responsible for me being on weight limited roads.

It has also been inconsiderate enough to make me responsible for where my lorry goes,instead of blaming some electronic device.

Blaming sat-nay for driving into cul-de-sacs, not seeing a bridge in time to be able to stop, or driving inside weight limits is simply not an acceptable excuse.The problems that have arisen have absolutely nothing to do with restrictions not being mapped into sat-nav.They are entirely due to drivers, (supposedly professionals) not using their own eyes and common sense.

Roy Latin By e-mail

Tags


comments powered by Disqus