1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
The arguments for Transit are clearly identified. It does everything
Page 41
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
pretty welt, nothing really badly and is still the favoured product for nearly one-in-three van buyers. Benchmarked against the best of its rivals, today's Transit is the best ever.
The 460, though? Ws all down to the numbers game, which we've attempted to illustrate with our productivity table.
Offering 52% more payload than an equivalent 3.5 tonne Transit, or 73% of the payload of a traditional 7.5-tonner are two of the numbers that put the Transit 460 into perspectve.
If a clear two tonnes of payload and 14.3m3 of volume mean enough to you to overcome the extra Legislative hurdles, then you could do worse than have the Ford on your shopping List.
Sadly, however, despite being believers in there being no such thing as too much power, we'd have to say that unless you realty need the performance of the five-cylinder engine and are exempt from speed limiting, the 140P5 is probably the sensible choice,