1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186 
Return loads problem
Page 64
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• The North-Western LA, Mr H. A. Jolliffe, at Liverpool on Wednesday reserved his decision on an application by Kirk and Co Ltd, Liverpool, to vary an existing Contract A licence covering four vehicles to A licence.
Mr G. H. P. Beams, for the applicant, said Kirk wanted the A licence in order to be able to carry return loads.
Mr J. E. Sanders, managing director, said his company carried prestressed and cast concrete beams for Pier Head Ltd, of Liverpool. It was unsatisfactory being unable to carry return loads; an A licence would enable Kirk to lower charges which would be a financial help to Pier Head.
Mr G. Clayton, for British Railways, said that as it was difficult for beams of the nature mentioned to be carried by rail, BR was only objecting the return work part of the application.